Death penalty Essay -- essays research papers

I believe that capital punishment has its benefits and can prevent move outs when apply andunderstood correctly.The close penalty given to citizenry judged to shed committed extremely heinous offensive activitys such as murder has been a practice since in the first place the beginning of Christianity.Since the 1800s some executions have resulted from convictions for murder. The UnitedStates is the only Western industrialized nation that still proceeds in capital punishment. War crimes, spying and murder are the only three offenses that have the possible penaltyof the death sentence. In recent years, capital punishment has become a very arguable issue in the United States and other countries.Opposition to the death penalty says that states that have capital punishment havea very high crime rate. What they do not take into consideration is that all the states aredifferent and have different populations, different numbers of major cities, and differentcrime rates. on that poin t is currently no capital punishment in Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine,Massachusetts, Michigan, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, andWisconsin. --Almost all have lower populations and a low crime rate. In otherwords, thestates that have capital punishment have it because of the high crime rates, not the otherway around. Studies have shown that capital punishment deters murders. In 1985, a studypromulgated by economist Stephen K. Layson at the University of North Carolina showedthat every execution of a murderer deters, on average, 18 murders. The study also showedthat raising the number of death sentences by one percent could prevent 105 murders. Itdoes not seem fair to me that a murderer can live while innocent people are dying,especially when it can be prevented. Violent crimes are capable of being deterred by lethal consequences for theiractions if only on a sub-conscience level. If the death penalty were just as consistent,lethal, and as unstoppable as the AIDS vi rus, criminals would have reason to back down. Following on from that, is the fact that abolitionists may claim that most studies showthat the death penalty has no effect on the murder rate at all. That is only because thosestudies have focused on inconsistent executions. ceiling punishment like all oth... ...penalty is not cruel or unusual, and is a Constitutionally accepted remedyfor a criminal act. In Trop v. Dulles, Chief rightness Eark Warren, no friend of the deathpenalty said, Whatever the arguments may be against capital punishment, bothon moral grounds and on grounds and in terms of accomplishing thepurpose of punishment the death penalty has been employed throughout our history, and in a day when it is still widely accepted, it cannot be saidto harm the concept of cruelty. So the constitution does allow capital punishment.As for the penal organization accidentally executing an innocent person, that is aproblem with the court system not capital punishment. It is up to t he jury and judge in amurder case to decide whether or not a person is delinquent or innocent, and if the murderershould be put to death.So capital punishment is very capable of deterring murder if we allow it to, butthe legal system is so slow and inefficient, criminals are able to stay several steps aheadof us and gain leeway through our lenience. Several reforms must be make in the justicesystem so the death penalty can cause positive effect.